About Me

My photo
Im ShunTre' and I'm currently taking this class, not because im interested in it but because I have to, it's part of my degree requirements but while i'm in it I hope to learn more about politics especially in Texas and get a grip on what they really mean and how do they make our lives easier or harder. I did terrible on the General knowledge and the Political knowledge quizzez in class by the way but I dont think I was the only one.

Monday, October 21, 2013

University of Texas Parent Study


On the American Independent website I found an article called The Goal Of UT parenting to Influence Decisions on Gay Marriages on how the supreme court conducted a study with the Witherspoon Institute to at The University of Texas that’s critical on gay parenting to see the outcome of children from their freshman year of college until graduation who were brought up in a same sex couple marriage.

The study was made to manipulate public policy and give them meaning the Supreme Court reasons on why same sex marriages should not be allowed on the state of Texas. When they studies it showed that children who were brought up in same sex couple households regardless if they lived with both parents or just one who was involved in a same sex relationship were more likely to experience negative social, physiological and economic outcomes than children who were raised in a heterosexual couple.

Religious groups have been challenging legality of same sex marriages for years and trying to use data to sway the public, lawmakers, and the courts to be on their side of the debate. Groups seeking to block gay marriage and also try to keep it from happening use this case study to show that their not just doing this to be cruel they have their "evidence" and some anti-same sex groups also came to the conclusion that "gay parents are inferior to straight parents".

The Catholic Bishops recently filed a friend of the court brief arguing that a mother and a father each bring something unique and irreplaceable when raising a child and that if the child is brought up in a same sex marriage that they will miss out on that "unique thing" from a mother and dad and will then grow up with some part that they never knew they could have missing which sounds very ridiculous to me!

Their intent for this article I think was to sway readers in believing that same sex couples do a terrible job at raising kids and since they can’t raise their children the "right way" to even say there is a right way they can't get married basically and that to me is not right. I feel that just because their children don’t have positive outcomes doesn't mean they can’t grant the right to get married because that has nothing to do with getting married.

Who’s to say just because they’re the same sex that means their children are going to have rough childhoods growing up, there is more to a child's upbringing than their parents you also have to focus on they friends they hang out with and what activities they partake in, their economic statuses, there are more than just the sex of someone’s parents to determine their lives in the future!

I also didn't agree with how they did the case study they used one school, first of all if you’re doing any type of study you need all the different types of subjects, they didn't do children of same sex couples who attend private schools, who were homed schooled, or who didn't even go to school and that could've most definitely changed or alter the results they did get.

No one should be denied rights to marry because of some unorganized, poorly put together study that portray same sex couples to be these terrible people who have no common sense on how to raise a child because it isn't right I mean there's people who grew in heterosexual households and came out with negative social problems and economic hardships and I doubt that was because their parents weren't a same sex couple!

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

My Starbucks Gun Rule Response!



In this article "Starbucks CEO ‘respectfully’ says guns not wanted" posted on  Star-Telegram.com, September 19th, the author talks about how Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz decided to make a request for the customers to please not bring their guns in or around the Starbucks businesses unless their authorized law enforcement personnel. He stated that Starbucks is a place where people come to enjoy coffee and community and when a customer decides to bring their weapon with them knowing it's visible to other customers it may anger some of the customers and/or make them feel unsafe and that's not the type of vibe Starbucks is supposed to give off.

 I agree with the CEO because he's taking a stand and is actually showing his customers that he does care about them and their safety and if that means no guns allowed then so be it. Howard isn't taking away their gun law or their right to carry a concealed weapon that they obviously have legally, he just doesn't want that type of environment.

 People have recently said in the reaction letter to this article that Starbucks is trying to fight their Second Amendment right and that's not at all true, Starbucks doesn't even have the RIGHT to do that! I would actually prefer all local businesses to partake in this request because all of these horrible crimes that have happened in the last couple of years involving shootings and guns make it really hard to trust people with firearms or any type of weapon really.

His request is a very legit request in my opinion, why not prohibit guns from businesses because I'm pretty sure if you ask any other place like McDonalds or Subway they wouldn't want any guns in their place of work because that can cause major controversy from people getting angry to people walking out and never come back.

Guns should really be in your home or vehicle and away from the public and especially children. No one wants their child around guns that's scary and yes children do drink coffee too because my sister is eight years old and is always at Starbucks so don't just think it's a mature audience your bringing your gun around. Starbucks also made their point by simply saying if you can't follow this very simple request go find your coffee somewhere else!

 I believe this article was intended for Starbuck customers obviously and I really hope they take in consideration for this request because I think it would make a big difference and maybe even become a global policy for local businesses to follow.